We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
How much sway case legislation holds may well differ by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances on the current case. To discover this concept, look at the following case regulation definition.
Because the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is reached, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to your determination of your current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but are usually not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may well find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were instructed of the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Safe and sound with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they had nothing at all to worry about.
However it's made obvious that police is free to just take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities issue to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused into the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also be certain respect with the family shed in accordance with legislation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they will act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security of the house is concerned, which is not really public place under the Act 1977. 9. Contemplating the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been obtained. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of within the terms stated earlier mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Only the written opinions from the Supreme Court along with the Court of Appeals are routinely accessible. Decisions on the lower (trial) courts are usually not generally published or dispersed.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to possibly party plus the case shall be decided via the competent court of law if pending. Read more
10. Based to the findings from the inquiry committee, this petition isn't considered maintainable and is particularly therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent along with the case under appeal, Possibly overruling the previous case regulation by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This may well happen several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first on the High Court of Justice, later of the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his growth from the concept of estoppel starting inside the High Trees case.
Criminal cases In the common legislation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil law systems, common legislation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions constant here with the previous decisions of higher courts.